Tuesday, April 28, 2009

You know I love her. I've written about her here before and I was so excited that she agreed to be the first beU interview.

Julianne Brenza practiced corporate securities law before taking up the practice of yoga after adopting her third child 9 years ago. This was very fortunate for her students, like me. One of the many things I admire about Julianne is the depth of knowledge about both the anatomical and philosophical aspects of yoga she brings into class to help us evolve our practice and our lives.

Recently she introduced us to the Vedic concept of Gunas, and I was excited to have the opportunity outside of class to learn more about it.

BeU: Tell me about the Gunas.

JB: Guna is a quality.

BeU: Meaning a characteristic?

JB: Exactly. Interchangeable with the concept of characteristic or nature. If you can picture or feel this, it is something that can be reduced no further, it is irreducible. These states, the Gunas, are that which can go no further down. Ultimately, the Gunas are the 3 forms of that which cannot be reduced no further in nature and human nature. In all of matter.

The three Gunas are: Rajas, Tamas and Sattva. So when one describes these, which makes them adjectives, one would say Rajastic, Tamastic and Sattvic.

When something in nature is said to have a lot of Rajas, it has a lot of fire. It’s a masculine quality, high energy. There’s on open, anxious quality to it. It has the quality of change.

Tamas is stagnant. It’s dark, it’s very heavy, depressed. There’s lack of movement as opposed to change. It really is the opposite of Rajas. There’s a decaying quality to Tamas.

Now, the balance of the both, not the absence, which is really cool. The balance is Sattva. The balance of the two. Clarity, lucidity, balance. Sattva is clear energy.

BeU: Do each of these qualities have a spectrum from positive to negative? So when you describe Rajas as anxious, that would be the down side of Rajas energy?

JB: Absolutely. You would say the higher side of Rajas, the upper scale of Rajas.

Think about nature, the seasons. The leaves fall off the trees, they decay which is tamasic, but then the way they feed and nourish the earth is the sattva quality of that.

In a person, someone who is Rajasic is aggressive and can be frenetic. Sometimes to effectuate a goal, you need Rajasic energy. Other times, you need Tamasic energy, time to contemplate where you are and to get perspective. You can't just keep running and running. When you are able to slow down and dilute your Rajasic energy and give a boost to your Tamasic energy, it brings you into your Sattvic state. Everyone’s got a different state, obviously, with a different balance, but it’s all relative. Just as in nature, everyone has their own balance.

In Ayurvedic terms, there’s the personality types called constitutions: pitta, vata, kapha. Pitta is Rajasic - notoriously the leaders, the effectors. Kaphic is typically thought to be tamasic. Taken out of balance, an overly kaphic person can go into depression.

BeU: Right, when you first described Tamasic it sounded entirely negative. I guess a big part of this is acknowledging and appreciating value of the whole spectrum.

JB: Exactly. Too much fire in a room blows the room up. Too much tamas in a room makes it perish and that’s where, when one has a group, in a perfect world, you would hope to have a combination of all characteristics. It's all about balance.

BeU: Since I’m always trying to put things in a box to understand them more clearly, I’m wondering...is the theory that we are innately one or the other, tamas or rajas? Or in different situations or different parts of our lives we tend to default to one or the other?

JB: I guess one can argue they’re one in the same. At different phases of your life, external circumstances bring one state or another. How you react is what your innate characteristic is. There’s where you go when you are imbalanced. Very important point. When you become imbalanced, what happens? Rajasic energy or Tamasic energy? There are also external situations like the weather - is it really hot out? is the air rajasic? The weather changes, your body changes. You become one with your environment.

BeU: When you spoke about this in class you connected it to springtime.

JB: In the yogic cycle, in any cycle, but certainly in yogic, spring is awakening . You’re firing up your rajasic energy. Very often in classes the way to do it is through inversions. So you're taking tamasic energy from the winter (grounding, hoarding, hibernation) and you're turning it upside down in the spring. Very typically, yoga teachers and disciplines will get you on your head. Literally, shake up your energy, let it flow in a different direction. That’s the asana way of doing it. So you have your nature and that which is natural to the environment or season and you have to make that balance.

BeU: And be able to trust that as opposed to rigidly sticking to one way of being all the time.

JB: In our culture it's easy to run faster. For the sattva concept of self acceptance, adding tamas energy to create your own sattva is not inconsequential.

BeU: I love conversations like this that help me appreciate the full spectrum as opposed to wanting to label each part as good or bad, as I was doing initially - this is where you want to be, and this is where you don't want to be. The truth is in the middle. You want balance of the two and the ability to appreciate there is a reason for where you are and that you are working your way back to balance. It reminds me of when I was really into the Myers-Briggs work and thinking in terms of introvert and extrovert. This is another language for people to use to understand and accept themselves and others.

JB: Completely. Particularly as one moves through different stages of life, recognizing what is in your environment and who is in your environment is important. The foods in your environment, the lifestyle. How all of that has perhaps aggravated or overly enhanced your state such that there's an inability to create sattva.

BeU: Do you believe we could get to a point where we are intuitive about it? I get overwhelmed by trying to understand this at an academic level. I'd love to think that I was sensitive enough to get to my own sattva easily.

JB: Resoundingly, yes! It's self regulation. The coolest, most underestimated concept of development in your 40's. But that's another subject. A whole other blog I think! (Laughing) Are you giving yourself the space literally and figuratively to learn to self regulate and to learn what your calibration is? Hopefully the external environment triggers or inspires you to re-balance yourself which is really a beautiful thing.

BeU: It is.

Sometimes I can only identify I've been through a stage, for me it's usually tamasic, until after it's over. It's so helpful to be able to know - I'm in X stage now - and it will balance out. Again, it comes back to not letting myself get to the point where I'm experiencing something as really wrong in my life as opposed to a natural transition. Somehow finding a way to appreciate that. I don't know that your ever going to enjoy it, but to appreciate it for what it is and to anticipate something beneficial coming out on the other side.

JB: Something sattvic. I find there's a comfort in being able to reduce everything, there's a simplicity, it is the law of the universe, the law of nature. I believe people are trying to get to their own balance. Learning what you need to do to get to your own sattva is so exquisite, so wonderful and it's completely achievable, although over a lifetime.

BeU: Sattva itself is never static. So you're always coming in and out.

JB: And that is so cool. It's dynamic. Your sattva at any given moment could be way more rajasic energy than you may have innately. To stay up all night to nurse a sick child. That type of thing. You do it because you do it.

Now I have to go meet a school bus!

BeU: Thanks Julianne!

Monday, April 27, 2009

How can a soap claim to not only clean your hands, but "freshen your conscience and inspire your soul?" Because it is created using the glycerin that is left over from the bio fuel (which powers cars) that's made from the waste grease from the kitchens of Los Angeles restaurants. When further soap is then used in the bathrooms of those restaurants where it originated, it creates a "perfect, sustainable circle."

When human ingenuity is applied in a mindful way to everyday solutions, I get a glimpse into a future that feels so good. It looks and smells good too.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Happy Earth Day


Earth Day was yesterday, I know. In 1970 it was visionary to designate one day of the year but, honestly, in 2009 who would dispute that every day is Earth Day? Not my friend Cynthia Brennan. Last weekend was the opening of her new market, Table, in Bedford Hills, NY.

As a mom, designer, artist and entrepreneur, Cynthia is one of the most talented (and busiest) people I know. I remember when she discovered the food market 2 doors down from her sustainable design shop was closing. She became passionate about the idea of opening a year-round, indoor farmers market to sell organic and/or local, artisanal quality food. It has been a long, uncertain trip up a very steep learning curve, but the result is a wonderful gift to our community.

Cynthia's husband Patrick, an architect, completed the build-out of the space using LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification practices, and every interior detail has been thoughtfully and artfully designed by her. The newspaper flowers and glass globe sculpture in the photos demonstrate Cynthia's signature style!

Maybe I should mention that the food is de.li.cious. Executive chef Jonathan Pratt and his team use the seasonal ingredients currently in their inventory to prepared foods for eat in or take out. I cannot recommend Table highly enough for anyone living in the area.

Table was featured today on Martha Stewart's blog.
The photo of the Israeli couscous beet salad is from Martha's post. I have had it several times already and it is amazing.

Cynthia is enabling conscious food choices and for that I say congratulations and thanks!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

What does "spirit" look like ?

This was a topic of dinner conversation last week and I recommend it for your next dinner party. It contains key ingredients for a good debate: unexamined stereotypes, implicit but ambiguous morality and an undefined scope. Just add margaritas (optional).

When somebody is described as spiritual, what image pops into your mind? Does it include any of the following?:

incense, Buddha, an altar, incense and Buddha on an altar, health food, psychedelic t-shirts, crystals, the lotus pose, the Dalai Lama, the "self help" section? Most of us would agree this is an outdated characterization and if we really consider what makes somebody spiritual, the answer is found below that surface. So what is the answer?

I have to stop here and write what I really believe is the ultimate truth: Every human being is spiritual. There is not a body out there that doesn't come with a spirit. It's like air - it's invisible, but it's there. It's never not there. It's keeping you alive even if you never acknowledge it. You don't have to believe it exists, it's still there.

So, if that is the truth, is the conversation over? Or is there a distinction to be made between everybody and people like me? Let's call us "spiritual enthusiasts" - people who are explicit about their spiritual nature. Not only do we believe in it, we know it exists. We want to actively engage it. We love to read about it, talk about it, analyze and blog about it. We want to understand it, maximize it, explore and study it. Some dress the part, and some of us wear our Chi Mihara's with skinny leg jeans and call it self expression.

I go to church regularly, do lots of charity work, read stacks of books on personal transformation, practice yoga, drink green tea and design clothing with inspirational messages. Does that make me spiritual? No.

Those are expressions of my interests and me doing what feels right for me. And, I am very clear there is a huge difference between doing these things and actually being spiritual. Being is where the rubber meets the road. Being spiritual is an internal approach to life, ourselves and others. It's the intention and motivation that precedes our actions much more than the actions themselves. I keep this, written by Neal Donald Walsh, taped to my bathroom mirror as the closest "how to" be spiritual I can find:
"Embrace every circumstance, own every fault, share every joy, contemplate every mystery, walk in every man's shoes, forgive every offense (including your own), heal every heart, honor every person's truth, adore every person's God, protect every person's rights, preserve every person's dignity, promote every person's interests, presume every person's holiness. Be a living, breathing example of the Highest Truth that resides within you."
Unable to define pornography, Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart famously said “I know it when I see it” and the same could be said for defining spirituality (awesome. I worked porn in.) Except it's less about what we see. "I know it when I feel it" is more accurate. What does spirit feel like to you?

photo: Ogden, the Inappropriate Yoga Guy, from his recent episodes on yogajournal.com

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

super model, really


Don't hate her because she's a bombshell. Hate her because she is self aware, grounded, taking responsibility for her own happiness, and empowering young girls to do the same.

When I sat on the beach with the May issue of "Vanity Fair" I, regrettably, did not expect to relate in any way to the cover girl and most famous supermodel in the world, Gisele. Glimpses into a glamorous life, that's what I expected. Feeling morally superior, that's my usual M.O.

Instead, I was caught off guard by her determination to rise above expectations like mine and show some substance. At 28, Gisele is young and has been modeling for half of her life. It would almost be easier to understand self indulgent behavior than a mindful perspective on life, but that's what comes across in her story.

She boldly says "everything I'll do in the future has to be something that's related to higher consciousness. I don't think I'll be happy unless I do this." A positive message for a celebrity obsessed culture to hear, don't you think?

You can read the article by Leslie Bennetts here.

a new way to roll


...is a great tag line for the KIA soul. A stylish, zippy car that should appeal to young drivers with a start price of $14,000. Another tag line is "Free your mind. Express your freedom. Meet your soul." Sign of the times? I'm just sayin.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Vacation & Inspiration

I'm just getting back from a week in California, riding the roller coaster on the Santa Monica pier and enjoying warm weather. More to come about that...

For now, here is something that inspired me today. It's a video clip of 47 year old Susan Boyle going for her dream on the TV show "Britain's Got Talent." It is 7 minutes long, but 5 of those are goose bump material, so it's very worth watching.

Susan is reminiscent of Paul Potts auditioning for the same show 2 seasons ago. He eventually won the competition. This clip has been viewed over 11 million times on YouTube - about 10 of those views are mine. If you like stories of an underdog gathering their courage and wowing the world with what they've got inside of them, you will love these.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Yoga in the Olympics?

There is a movement underway to make yoga an Olympic sport. I'm unclear about what group is driving this effort, but it is definitely in progress and if the IOC (International Olympic Committee) agrees, yoga could be an event at the 2020 games.

My initial response to hearing this news was - that's just wrong, "competitive yoga" is a contradiction. One of the many reasons to love yoga is feeling safe and accepted exactly where you are while in class - mentally, physically and emotionally. It is the opposite of competition. Can't we keep one place that is free from the judgment we face outside the studio walls?

On the other hand, anybody who practices yoga (especially any form of ashtanga) knows it requires the physical conditioning, mental rigor and nuanced skill to match any other sport. And there's no denying that all yoga is not equal - there is an elite level of practice to be reached. So maybe it would be right for yoga to be recognized and given the exposure of an Olympic sport.

Feeling torn, I investigated further and decided that I have a narrow, American view of what yoga is and is not. In India, the birthplace of yoga, there have been "yoga championships" for 1200 years and yoga is a popular sport in their high schools and colleges. That makes the non-competition argument seem silly. Are we putting a significance on yoga that doesn't need to be there? My conclusion is that the general American interpretation (i.e. mine) of yoga is still young and incomplete.

There are doubters who, beliefs aside, see yoga as too subjective and think the IOC is looking for sports that are objectively decided, such as who crosses the finish line first, and they want action packed events that will play well on TV. If you have a hard time picturing how yoga would work as a competition, take a look at this video from the 2008 yoga championships in New York. As someone who loves yoga, I find this beautiful and amazing.

I believe the truth about yoga is that your practice can be exactly what you want it to be - competition on the world stage or personal experience. And I also believe it is inevitable, as the worldwide popularity of yoga grows, if not in 2020, yoga will one day be an Olympic sport. Do you agree?